🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could possibly return the legislation for further review if he has objections.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence comparable debates in other EU countries